Legislature(2023 - 2024)
2023-05-16 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2023-05-16 House Journal Page 1144 HB 135 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the May 15 calendar (page 1119), was read the third time: HOUSE BILL NO. 135 am "An Act relating to and disapproving recommendations of the State Officers Compensation Commission; and providing for an effective date." The question being: "Shall HB 135 am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 135 am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 29 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Allard, Armstrong, Carpenter, Coulombe, Cronk, Eastman, Edgmon, Foster, Galvin, Gray, Groh, C.Johnson, D.Johnson, Josephson, McCabe, McCormick, McKay, Mears, Mina, Prax, Ruffridge, Saddler, Shaw, Stapp, Story, Tilton, Tomaszewski, Vance, Wright Nays: Carrick, Dibert, Fields, Hannan, Himschoot, Ortiz, Patkotak, Rauscher, Schrage, Stutes, Sumner Himschoot changed from "YEA" to "NAY" Ortiz changed from "YEA" to "NAY" 2023-05-16 House Journal Page 1145 And so, HB 135 am passed the House. Representative Saddler moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Sumner gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on HB 135 am. HB 135 Representative Patkotak moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of HB 135 am be taken up on the same day. There was objection. The question being: "Shall reconsideration of HB 135 am be taken up on the same day?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 135 am Third Reading Take Up Reconsideration on the Same Day YEAS: 29 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Allard, Armstrong, Carpenter, Coulombe, Cronk, Dibert, Foster, Galvin, Gray, Groh, C.Johnson, D.Johnson, McCabe, McCormick, McKay, Mears, Ortiz, Patkotak, Prax, Rauscher, Ruffridge, Saddler, Shaw, Stapp, Story, Tilton, Tomaszewski, Vance, Wright Nays: Carrick, Eastman, Edgmon, Fields, Hannan, Himschoot, Josephson, Mina, Schrage, Stutes, Sumner And so, the motion passed. HB 135 am was before the House in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall HB 135 am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2023-05-16 House Journal Page 1146 HB 135 am Third Reading Final Passage Reconsideration YEAS: 33 NAYS: 7 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Allard, Armstrong, Carpenter, Coulombe, Cronk, Dibert, Eastman, Edgmon, Foster, Galvin, Gray, Groh, Himschoot, C.Johnson, D.Johnson, Josephson, McCabe, McCormick, McKay, Mears, Mina, Ortiz, Prax, Rauscher, Ruffridge, Saddler, Shaw, Stapp, Story, Tilton, Tomaszewski, Vance, Wright Nays: Carrick, Fields, Hannan, Patkotak, Schrage, Stutes, Sumner And so, HB 135 am passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Saddler moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HB 135 am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.